PI Global Investments
Precious Metals

Electronic structure regulation of ruthenium sites via cobalt and copper dual doping for acidic water splitting


Electrochemical water splitting powered by renewable electricity offers a compelling pathway to sustainable hydrogen production [1]. However, scalable industrial deployment remains constrained by substantial energy inefficiencies arising from sluggish kinetics of both the cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) [2]. Consequently, the development of highly efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts capable of operating at low overpotentials for both HER and OER within a single electrolyte is imperative [3]. In comparison with alkaline systems, acidic electrolytes afford superior protonic conductivity and diminished ohmic losses; nonetheless, their highly corrosive milieu, coupled with insufficient electrocatalyst stability under acidic OER conditions, markedly impedes reaction kinetics [4]. Ruthenium-based materials (e.g., RuO2) have emerged as economically viable alternatives to precious Pt/Ir catalysts owing to their analogous electronic structures [5,6]. Nonetheless, monometallic RuO2 exhibits pronounced performance degradation during prolonged OER operation, primarily due to over-oxidation that induces lattice oxygen loss and ruthenium dissolution [7]. Furthermore, the semiconducting nature of RuO2 engenders substantial charge-transfer resistance, further compromising catalytic efficiency [8]. These challenges underscore the critical need to design robust ruthenium-based catalysts with optimized electronic configurations and stabilized active sites to enable durable acidic OER.

Electronic modulation via heterointerface engineering stands as a central strategy for optimizing catalytic performance. The metallic/semiconducting RuO2@Ru interface can establish a built-in electric field arising from work-function disparities, which drives interfacial charge redistribution [9]. This redistribution perturbs the d-band center of active sites, thereby modulating the adsorption strength of oxygen intermediates and accelerating reaction kinetics [10]. Moreover, the RuO2@Ru heterostructure spatially decouples active functions: metallic Ru domains favor proton adsorption, whereas RuO2 facets promote oxygen evolution, collectively balancing adsorption and desorption energetics of intermediates [11]. While heterointerface engineering is effective, further electronic modulation is often required. Transition-metal doping has emerged as a powerful means to tailor the electronic structure of Ru-based catalysts with precision [12]. Among potential dopants, cobalt (Co) and copper (Cu) were selected for this study due to their distinct and complementary functionalities. Co doping substitutes Ru4+ in the RuO2 lattice, stabilizing oxygen vacancies through the formation of stronger Cosingle bondO bonds, thereby suppressing lattice oxygen participation during OER and mitigating structural degradation [13]. In contrast, Cu doping contributes electrons to Ru d-orbitals owing to its lower electronegativity (Cu = 1.90; Ru = 2.20), effectively reducing the oxidation state of surface Ru species and weakening Rusingle bondO binding, which facilitates Osingle bondO intermediate formation such as *OOH [14]. However, single-metal dopants often present an activity–stability trade-off, arising from dissolution or insufficient electronic modulation. This underscored the necessity for dual-metal synergistic designs that can achieve balanced performance [15]. The fundamental reason behind this trade-off is that single dopants often modulate the electronic structure in a unilateral manner. For instance, Co doping primarily enhances stability by strengthening the metal‑oxygen bonds, but may over-stabilize intermediate adsorption, thus compromising activity [16,17]. Conversely, Cu doping optimizes activity by facilitating intermediate desorption, yet might weaken the overall structural integrity [18]. Dual-metal doping offers a route to mitigate these limitations while reducing noble-metal content and enhancing intrinsic activity [19]. The integration of dual-metal doping with heterointerface engineering presents a synergistic framework to address these challenges. Theoretical studies suggest that Co and Cu co-doping can concurrently stabilize oxygen vacancies and optimize intermediate adsorption strength, while the Ru/RuO2 heterointerface facilitates rapid charge transfer [20]. However, experimental realization of such bimetallic doped RuO2@Ru heterostructures, especially those custom-designed for acidic overall water splitting, has not yet been fully explored.

In this work, we reported a cobalt and copper co-doped RuO2@Ru heterostructured catalyst synthesized via a hydrothermal-ion exchange strategy, engineered to enhance both the HER and OER in acidic environments. Benefiting from the optimized electronic state of the Ru sites, the Co, Cu-RuO2@Ru catalyst exhibits exceptional activity under acidic conditions. Specifically, for OER, it delivers an ultralow overpotential of 182 mV at 10 mA cm2, surpassing most reported Ru-based electrocatalysts. For HER, it requires only 217 mV to reach 250 mA cm2, outperforming benchmark Pt/C. Characterization and electronic analyses indicate that the Ru/RuO2 heterostructure, combined with Co and Cu co-doping, promotes the emergence of low-oxidation-state Ru within RuO2 and the formation of electron-deficient Ru metal. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations further reveal that the reduced Ru oxidation state and the electron-deficient Ru core optimize the adsorption energetics of hydrogen and oxygenated intermediates, thereby enhancing the kinetics of both HER and OER.



Source link

Related posts

Nord Precious Metals Announces Unit Financing

D.William

Down Arrow Button Icon

D.William

Support and Resistance Levels for 18 Instruments (Gold, Silver, Platinum, Palladium, Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Copper, and Ten Major Currency Pairs)

D.William

Leave a Comment