Key Insights
-
Channel Infrastructure NZ’s significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
-
The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Channel Infrastructure NZ Limited (NZSE:CHI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 49% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
And institutions on the other hand have a 33% ownership in the company. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.
Let’s delve deeper into each type of owner of Channel Infrastructure NZ, beginning with the chart below.
View our latest analysis for Channel Infrastructure NZ
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Channel Infrastructure NZ?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Channel Infrastructure NZ. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It’s therefore worth looking at Channel Infrastructure NZ’s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Hedge funds don’t have many shares in Channel Infrastructure NZ. Ampol Limited is currently the company’s largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.3% and 5.1% of the stock.
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 21 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock’s expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
Insider Ownership Of Channel Infrastructure NZ
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Channel Infrastructure NZ Limited. In their own names, insiders own NZ$20m worth of stock in the NZ$700m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
General Public Ownership
The general public– including retail investors — own 49% stake in the company, and hence can’t easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
Public Company Ownership
We can see that public companies hold 14% of the Channel Infrastructure NZ shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
Next Steps:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We’ve spotted 2 warning signs for Channel Infrastructure NZ you should be aware of.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.