Official VIZSLA SILVER CORP. press release
Highlights of the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate, including a comparison to the previous mineral resource estimate released in
- 48.7% increase in indicated mineral resources from 104.8 to 155.8 Moz AgEq
- 48.7% increase in inferred mineral resources from 114.1 to 169.6 Moz AgEq
- 17% increase in average indicated mineral resource grade from 437 to 511 g/t AgEq
- New addition of La Luisa containing 4.0 Moz AgEq indicated and 25.3 Moz AgEq of Inferred Resources
Key Statistics:
- The Updated Mineral Resource represents less than 10% of the known vein strike of the newly consolidated district
- 90% of the value of the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate is comprised of precious metals, including 56% from silver
- A total of 11 epithermal veins were included in the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate
- Total all-in exploration cost of
US$0.32 /oz AgEq discovered
Indicated Mineral Resources are estimated at 9.5 million tonnes (“Mt”) grading 289 grams per tonne (“g/t”) silver, 2.41 g/t gold, 0.27% lead, and 0.84% zinc (511 g/t silver equivalent (“AgEq”)). The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate includes indicated mineral resources of 88.2 million ounces (“Moz”) of silver, 736 thousand ounces (“koz”) of gold, 25.4 kilotonnes (“kt”) of lead, and 79.9 kt of zinc (155.8 Moz AgEq).
Inferred Mineral Resources are estimated at 12.2 Mt grading 239 g/t silver, 1.93 g/t gold, 0.29% lead, and 1.03% zinc (433 g/t AgEq). The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate includes inferred mineral resources of 93.7 Moz of silver, 758 koz of gold, 35.4 kt of lead, and 125.3 kt of zinc (169.6 Moz AgEq).
The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate is centred on the western portion of
“We are pleased to announce another significant resource update milestone for the high-grade
“The Project’s indicated resource now stands at 88 million ounces of silver and 736 thousand ounces of gold, while the inferred resource contains 94 million ounces of silver and 758 thousand ounces of gold. This represents a 49% increase in both indicated and inferred ounces and a 17% increase in indicated grade relative to the previous estimate. Resource focused drilling throughout 2023 was successful in converting almost half of the
“What’s most impressive is that although we continue to expand the Project’s mineral inventory year after year, our current resource still accounts for less than 10% of the known veins we have in the district. Going forward, we will focus on de-risking and advancing the high-grade resource in the west towards development, taking advantage of the Project’s incredible infrastructure, while simultaneously hunting for the next epicenter of mineralization in the central and eastern portions of the district. This is an outstanding achievement that comes as a result of hard work and perseverance. I want to thank everyone from the entire Vizsla team, including our contractors and local communities, and look forward to another successful year in 2024.”
A technical report is being prepared on the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI-43-101“) and will be available on the Company’s website and SEDAR within 45 days of the date of this release. The effective date of the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate is
Panuco Project Resource Summary (150 g/t AgEq cut-off)
Updated MRE |
Previous MRE |
Variance |
||||
Resource Class |
Indicated |
Inferred |
Indicated |
Inferred |
Indicated |
Inferred |
Tonnes (MT) |
9.5 |
12.2 |
7.5 |
7.2 |
2.0 |
5.0 |
Au g/t |
2.41 |
1.93 |
2.12 |
2.14 |
0.29 |
-0.21 |
Ag g/t |
289 |
239 |
243 |
304 |
46 |
-65 |
Pb % |
0.27 |
0.29 |
0.23 |
0.19 |
0.04 |
0.10 |
Zn % |
0.84 |
1.03 |
0.71 |
0.54 |
0.13 |
0.49 |
AgEq (g/t) |
511 |
433 |
437 |
491 |
74 |
-58 |
AuEq (g/t) |
6.81 |
5.76 |
5.82 |
6.55 |
0.99 |
-0.79 |
Au (koz) |
736 |
758 |
508 |
496 |
228 |
262 |
Ag (koz) |
88,192 |
93,653 |
58,330 |
70,672 |
29,862 |
22,981 |
Pb (kt) |
56.0 |
35.4 |
17.2 |
13.7 |
38.8 |
21.7 |
Zn (kt) |
79.9 |
125.3 |
53.3 |
38.9 |
26.6 |
86.4 |
1AgEq (koz) |
155,841 |
169,647 |
104,793 |
114,113 |
51,048 |
55,534 |
2AuEq (koz) |
2,076 |
2,261 |
1,404 |
1,516 |
672 |
745 |
Panuco Project Indicated & Inferred Mineral Resource Summary by Vein (150 g/t AgEq cut-off)
Classification |
Tonnes |
Average Grade |
Contained Metal |
||||||||||
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
AgEq |
Au Eq |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
1AgEq |
2AuEq |
||
(Mt) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
( %) |
( %) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(koz) |
(koz) |
(kt) |
(kt) |
(koz) |
(koz) |
|
Indicated |
|||||||||||||
|
4.5 |
380 |
2.46 |
0.08 |
0.15 |
573 |
7.64 |
55,201 |
358 |
3.7 |
6.9 |
83,270 |
1,110 |
|
0.6 |
358 |
2.24 |
0.12 |
0.21 |
538 |
7.18 |
7,295 |
46 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
10,953 |
146 |
Cristiano |
0.2 |
581 |
3.37 |
0.25 |
0.43 |
858 |
11.45 |
3,961 |
23 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
5,851 |
78 |
|
5.4 |
385 |
2.48 |
0.09 |
0.17 |
580 |
7.74 |
66,457 |
427 |
5.0 |
9.2 |
100,074 |
1,343 |
Napoleon |
3.3 |
162 |
2.39 |
0.52 |
1.73 |
425 |
5.66 |
17,276 |
255 |
17.2 |
57.4 |
45,223 |
603 |
Napoleon HW |
0.4 |
164 |
1.72 |
0.42 |
1.53 |
365 |
4.87 |
2,259 |
24 |
1.8 |
6.5 |
5,029 |
67 |
Luisa |
0.3 |
177 |
2.56 |
0.39 |
2.01 |
459 |
6.12 |
1556 |
22 |
1.1 |
5.5 |
4,027 |
54 |
Josephine |
0.1 |
221 |
2.88 |
0.39 |
1.11 |
492 |
6.56 |
491 |
6 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
1,092 |
15 |
Cruz |
0.0 |
144 |
2.01 |
0.37 |
1.71 |
373 |
4.97 |
153 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
396 |
5 |
NP Area |
4.1 |
164 |
2.34 |
0.50 |
1.72 |
421 |
5.66 |
21,735 |
309 |
20.4 |
70.7 |
55,767 |
743 |
Total |
9.5 |
289 |
2.41 |
0.27 |
0.84 |
511 |
6.81 |
88,192 |
736 |
25.4 |
79.9 |
155,841 |
2,076 |
Inferred |
|||||||||||||
|
3.2 |
332 |
1.77 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
476 |
6.34 |
33,722 |
179 |
3.7 |
6.2 |
48,320 |
644 |
|
1.0 |
365 |
2.04 |
0.22 |
0.39 |
540 |
7.21 |
12,260 |
69 |
2.3 |
4.0 |
18,140 |
242 |
Cristiano |
0.7 |
443 |
2.54 |
0.15 |
0.29 |
650 |
8.66 |
10,213 |
59 |
1.1 |
2.0 |
14,974 |
200 |
|
4.9 |
355 |
1.94 |
0.15 |
0.25 |
515 |
6.86 |
56,195 |
307 |
7.1 |
12.3 |
81,434 |
1,081 |
Napoleon |
3.2 |
137 |
1.64 |
0.45 |
1.76 |
342 |
4.57 |
14,045 |
168 |
14.4 |
55.9 |
35,063 |
467 |
Napoleon HW |
0.8 |
220 |
2.17 |
0.59 |
2.02 |
479 |
6.39 |
5,976 |
59 |
5.0 |
17.0 |
13,027 |
174 |
La Luisa |
2.0 |
159 |
2.13 |
0.30 |
1.51 |
386 |
5.15 |
10,439 |
139 |
6.0 |
30.8 |
25,326 |
338 |
Josephine |
0.2 |
161 |
2.05 |
0.33 |
1.00 |
364 |
4.85 |
1161 |
15 |
0.7 |
2.2 |
2,618 |
35 |
Cruz |
0.3 |
170 |
3.75 |
0.31 |
1.48 |
519 |
6.91 |
1698 |
37 |
1.0 |
4.6 |
5,169 |
69 |
NP Area |
6.6 |
157 |
1.97 |
0.41 |
1.68 |
383 |
5.10 |
33,319 |
418 |
27.1 |
110.6 |
81,203 |
1,082 |
|
0.3 |
226 |
1.30 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
325 |
4.33 |
2,038 |
12 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
2,936 |
39 |
*Animas |
0.4 |
169 |
1.68 |
0.29 |
0.60 |
327 |
4.37 |
2,101 |
21 |
1.1 |
2.3 |
4,074 |
54 |
Total |
12.2 |
239 |
1.93 |
0.29 |
1.03 |
433 |
5.76 |
93,653 |
758 |
35.4 |
125.3 |
169,647 |
2,261 |
*Animas is |
Panuco Project Indicated & Inferred Mineral Resource Sensitivity Table
Classification |
Tonnes |
Average Grade |
Contained Metal |
||||||||||
COG AgEq |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
AgEq |
AuEq |
Ag |
Au |
Pb |
Zn |
1AgEq |
2AuEq |
|
(Mt) |
(g/t) |
(koz) |
( %) |
( %) |
(g/t) |
(g/t) |
(koz) |
(koz) |
(kt) |
(kt) |
(koz) |
(koz) |
|
Indicated: |
|||||||||||||
300 |
5.58 |
415 |
3.41 |
0.31 |
0.96 |
718 |
9.57 |
74,501 |
612 |
17.2 |
53.5 |
128,810 |
1,716 |
250 |
6.54 |
375 |
3.09 |
0.3 |
0.95 |
653 |
8.70 |
78,809 |
651 |
19.5 |
62.2 |
137,286 |
1,830 |
200 |
7.86 |
331 |
2.75 |
0.29 |
0.9 |
581 |
7.75 |
83,610 |
694 |
22.2 |
70.8 |
146,774 |
1,958 |
150 |
9.48 |
289 |
2.41 |
0.27 |
0.84 |
511 |
6.81 |
88,192 |
736 |
25.4 |
79.9 |
155,841 |
2,076 |
120 |
10.75 |
263 |
2.2 |
0.25 |
0.79 |
467 |
6.22 |
91,066 |
759 |
26.8 |
85.3 |
161,308 |
2,149 |
100 |
11.74 |
246 |
2.05 |
0.24 |
0.75 |
437 |
5.82 |
92,965 |
773 |
27.7 |
88.5 |
164,833 |
2,195 |
Inferred: |
|||||||||||||
300 |
6.47 |
355 |
2.82 |
0.36 |
1.23 |
634 |
8.34 |
73,931 |
587 |
23.1 |
79.4 |
131,930 |
1,734 |
250 |
7.9 |
317 |
2.54 |
0.34 |
1.17 |
565 |
7.51 |
80,365 |
644 |
26.8 |
92.1 |
143,338 |
1,908 |
200 |
9.7 |
278 |
2.24 |
0.32 |
1.12 |
499 |
6.66 |
86,784 |
698 |
30.9 |
108.4 |
155,748 |
2,076 |
150 |
12.19 |
239 |
1.93 |
0.29 |
1.03 |
433 |
5.76 |
93,653 |
758 |
35.4 |
125.2 |
169,647 |
2,261 |
120 |
14.04 |
216 |
1.75 |
0.28 |
0.97 |
393 |
5.25 |
97,502 |
791 |
38.6 |
136.1 |
177,648 |
2,368 |
100 |
15.47 |
201 |
1.63 |
0.26 |
0.92 |
367 |
4.89 |
99,985 |
812 |
40.8 |
142.9 |
182,671 |
2,433 |
Note:
1AgEq = Ag ppm + (((Au ppm x Au price/gram) + (Pb% x Pb price/t) + (Zn% x Zn price/t))/Ag price/gram). Metal price assumptions are |
2AuEq = Au ppm + (((Ag ppm x Ag price/gram) + (Pb% x Pb price/t) + (Zn% x Zn price/t))/Au price/gram). Metal price assumptions are |
Panuco Project Updated Mineral Resource Estimate Notes:
- The classification of the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate into indicated and inferred mineral resources is consistent with current 2014 CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. The effective date for the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate is
September 1, 2023 . - All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and numbers may not add due to rounding.
- All mineral resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained by continuous 3D wireframe models, and are considered to have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction.
- Mineral resources are not mineral reserves. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves, do not have demonstrated economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.
- The database comprises a total of 822 drill holes for 302,931 metres of drilling completed by
Vizsla Silver betweenNovember 2019 andSeptember 2023 . - The mineral resource estimate is based on 28 three-dimensional (“3D”) resource models, constructed in Leapfrog, representing the Napoleon area (15 wireframes), the
Copala area (7 wireframes),Tajitos (1 wireframe), Animas (5 wireframes) andSan Antonio (1 wireframe). - Silver, gold, lead and zinc were estimated for each mineralization domain in the
Panuco Project . Blocks within each mineralized domain were interpolated using 1.5 metre capped composites assigned to that domain. To generate grade within the blocks, the inverse distance squared (ID2) interpolation method was used for all domains. All estimates are based on variable block dimensions (by deposit area) and estimation search parameters (by domain). - Average density values were assigned per zone based on 1,919 samples analysed by ALS in
Zacatecas, Mexico or inhouse with 5% checks by ALS. - It is envisioned that the
Panuco Project deposits may be mined using underground mining methods. Mineral resources are reported at a base case cut-off grade of 150 g/t AgEq. The mineral resource grade blocks were quantified above the base case cut-off grade, below surface and within the constraining mineralized wireframes. - The base-case AgEq Cut-off grade considers metal prices of
$24.00 /oz Ag,$1800 /oz Au,$2425 /t Pb and$2976 /t Zn and considers metal recoveries of 93% for silver, 90% for gold, 94% for Pb and 94% for Zn. - The base case cut-off grade of 150 g/t AgEq considers a mining cost of
US$45.00 /t rock and processing, treatment and refining, transportation and G&A cost ofUS$50.00 /t of mineralized material. - The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
The Company remains well-funded for its ongoing +65,000 metre 2024 drill program with four drill rigs designed to upgrade and expand the Project’s resource base and test high priority targets located in the west, central and eastern areas of the district. Dependent on ongoing exploration success, the Company plans to publish a further update to the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate in the second half of 2024.
Discovery Costs
To date, the Company has incurred an aggregate of approximately
About the
The newly consolidated
The district contains intermediate to low sulfidation epithermal silver and gold deposits related to siliceous volcanism and crustal extension in the Oligocene and Miocene. Host rocks are mainly continental volcanic rocks correlated to the Tarahumara Formation.
About
Quality Assurance / Quality Control
Drill core and rock samples were shipped to ALS Limited in
Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company’s quality assurance/ quality control protocol.
Qualified Person
The Updated Mineral Resource Estimate was completed by
Information Concerning Estimates of Mineral Resources
The scientific and technical information in this news release was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 which differs significantly from the requirements of the
You are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral resources will ever be converted into reserves. Pursuant to CIM Definition Standards, “inferred mineral resources” are that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Such geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An inferred mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an indicated mineral resource and must not be converted to a mineral reserve. However, it is reasonably expected that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated mineral resources with continued exploration. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the
The
Contact Information: For more information and to sign-up to the mailing list, please contact:
Tel: (604) 364-2215
Email: info@vizslasilver.ca
Website: www.vizslasilvercorp.ca
Neither
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release includes certain “Forward‐Looking Statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and “forward‐looking information” under applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “target”, “plan”, “forecast”, “may”, “would”, “could”, “schedule” and similar words or expressions, identify forward‐looking statements or information. These forward‐looking statements or information relate to, among other things: the exploration, development, and production at ; and the potential for underground mining methods; the preparation of a technical report on the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate; and the potential further update to the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate in the second half of 2023.
Forward‐looking statements and forward‐looking information relating to any future mineral production, liquidity, enhanced value and capital markets profile of
These statements reflect
SOURCE
© Canada Newswire, source