PI Global Investments
Finance

The judgment in Bendel v the Australian Taxation Office provides more questions than answers


The High Court’s decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel handed
down last week confirms what the Full Federal Court found last year: an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) owed to the corporate beneficiary of a discretionary trust is not a loan under tax law’s Division 7A rules.

The Australian Taxation Office’s position, maintained since 2009, was rejected by Australia’s highest court in a five to two majority.

Loading…



Source link

Related posts

How Investors Are Reacting To NVE (NVEC) Steady Earnings And Maintained Quarterly Dividend

D.William

State Street’s XLF or ProShares’ UYG: Which Financial ETF Is Right for Long-Term Investors?

D.William

Hoti: The approach to budget review is contrary to the law, Gruda probably has different expectations from you, but I am used to you

D.William

Leave a Comment