PI Global Investments
Finance

The judgment in Bendel v the Australian Taxation Office provides more questions than answers


The High Court’s decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel handed
down last week confirms what the Full Federal Court found last year: an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) owed to the corporate beneficiary of a discretionary trust is not a loan under tax law’s Division 7A rules.

The Australian Taxation Office’s position, maintained since 2009, was rejected by Australia’s highest court in a five to two majority.

Loading…



Source link

Related posts

LGPS guidance sets out local investment, advice and RI rules

D.William

Financial Report Card: The Weakest And Strongest Private Colleges In America

D.William

How The Eaton (ETN) Investment Story Is Shifting With New Deals Guidance And Mixed Analyst Views

D.William

Leave a Comment