PI Global Investments
Finance

The judgment in Bendel v the Australian Taxation Office provides more questions than answers


The High Court’s decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel handed
down last week confirms what the Full Federal Court found last year: an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) owed to the corporate beneficiary of a discretionary trust is not a loan under tax law’s Division 7A rules.

The Australian Taxation Office’s position, maintained since 2009, was rejected by Australia’s highest court in a five to two majority.

Loading…



Source link

Related posts

Meet Becky, a Corporate Finance Analyst – Graduate profile

D.William

Veirano hires corporate finance talent from Mattos Filho

D.William

Dandara appoints new finance director as it eyes billion-pound turnover | News

D.William

Leave a Comment